Identify
Name the requesting client and record its purpose.
Research direction / PACT
answer usefulness
−token cost
−disclosure risk
subject to permission + provenanceMore context is not automatically better context. Ninai explores retrieval as a constrained disclosure problem: preserve answer usefulness while reducing irrelevant tokens and unnecessary exposure.
PACT is a working engineering method in the MVP. It is not presented as academically novel until it is evaluated against credible baselines.
Pipeline / 01
Name the requesting client and record its purpose.
Resolve explicit grants before any search begins.
Search only rows within the allowed scope set.
Combine relevance, type-aware freshness, importance, and confidence.
Select the highest-value evidence that fits the packet budget.
Record the exact memory IDs, scopes, purpose, and estimated tokens.
Current signals / 02
The MVP uses deterministic weights that can be tested and changed. They are evaluation hypotheses, not immutable product truth.
Does the fact address this request?
How strongly did local retrieval surface it?
Is this memory current for its type?
Was the outcome marked consequential?
How reliable was extraction or entry?
Has this memory proved useful before?
Evaluation plan / 03
Ninai should be measured against full history, lexical top-k, semantic top-k, and future graph retrieval using the same questions and source evidence.
Next experiments / 04